In
1758, the taxonomist Linnaeus published in his Systema Naturae the
classification of species. Canis is a Latin word meaning dog, and under this
genus he listed the dog-like carnivores including domestic dogs, wolves, and
jackals. He classified the domestic dog as Canis familiaris (Linnaeus, 1758)
and on the next page as a separate species he classified the wolf as Canis
lupus (Linnaeus, 1758). In 1926, the International Commission on Zoological
Nomenclature (ICZN) ruled in Opinion 91 that the domestic dog Canis familiaris
(Linnaeus, 1758) be placed on its official list. In 1957, the ICZN ruled in
Opinion 451 that Canis dingo (Meyer, 1793) was the name to be used for the
dingo and that this be placed on its official list. These are the scientific
names for the dog and dingo that appear on the Official Lists and Indexes of Names
in Zoology of the ICZN.
In
1978, a review to reduce the number species listed under genus Canis proposed
that "Canis dingo is now generally regarded as a distinctive feral
domestic dog. Canis familiaris is used for domestic dogs, although
taxonomically it should probably be synonymous with Canis lupus." In 1982,
the first edition of Mammal Species of the World included a note under Canis
lupus with the comment: "Probably ancestor of and conspecific with the
domestic dog, familiaris. Canis familiaris has page priority over Canis lupus,
but both were published simultaneously in Linnaeus (1758), and Canis lupus has
been universally used for this species". In the same year, an application
was made to the ICZN to reclassify the dingo to Canis lupus dingo because it
was proposed that the wolf (Canis lupus) was the ancestor of dogs and dingoes,
however the application was rejected.
In
2003, the ICZN ruled in its Opinion 2027 that the "name of a wild
species...is not invalid by virtue of being predated by the name based on a
domestic form." Additionally, the ICZN placed the taxon Canis lupus as a conserved
name on the official list under this opinion. In the third edition of Mammal
Species of the World published in 2005, the mammalogist W. Christopher
Wozencraft listed under the wolf Canis lupus what he proposed to be two
subspecies: "familiaris Linneaus, 1758 [domestic dog]" and
"dingo Meyer, 1793 [domestic dog]", with the comment "Includes
the domestic dog as a subspecies, with the dingo provisionally separate –
artificial variants created by domestication and selective breeding. Although
this may stretch the subspecies concept, it retains the correct allocation of synonyms."
Although the earliest use of the name "dingo" was Canis familiaris
dingo (Blumenbach, 1780), Wozencraft attributed it to Meyer from 1793 without
comment.
This
classification by Wozencraft is hotly debated by zoologists. Mathew Crowther,
Stephen Jackson and Colin Groves disagree with Wozencraft and argue that based
on ICZN Opinion 2027, the implication is that a domestic animal cannot be a
subspecies. Crowther, Juliet Clutton-Brock and others argue that because the
dingo differs from wolves by behavior, morphology, and that the dingo and dog
do not fall genetically within any extant wolf clade, that the dingo should be
considered the distinct taxon Canis dingo. Jackson and Groves regard the dog
Canis familiaris as a taxonomic synonym for the wolf Canis lupus with them both
equally ranked at the species level. They also disagree with Crowther, based on
the overlap between dogs and dingoes in their morphology, in their ability to
easily hybridize with each other, and that they show the signs of domestication
by both having a cranium of smaller capacity than their progenitor, the wolf.
Given that Canis familiaris (Linnaeus, 1758) has date priority over Canis dingo
(Meyer, 1793), they regard the dingo as a junior taxonomic synonym for the dog
Canis familiaris. Gheorghe Benga and others support the dingo as a subspecies
of the dog from the earlier Canis familiaris dingo (Blumenbach, 1780). Xiaoming
Wang and Richard H. Tedford proposed that the dog should be classified as Canis
lupus familiaris under the Biological Species Concept and Canis familiaris
under the Evolutionary Species Concept.
Your blog provided us with valuable information to work with. Each & every tips of your post are awesome. Thanks a lot for sharing. Keep blogging.. this
ReplyDelete